Purpose The goal of this article is to examine the unwritten law of sports - a moral law - in relation to the purposeful act of continuing to score, when winning has been already secured, in normative terms of sportsmanship. Methods To do this, this article analyzed previous debates on the unwritten law about overwhelming victory and looked at the pros and cons of this law. Then, I contemplated the reasons for these opposite views, as well as the values and theories underpinning these views from the perspective of the nature and morality of sports. Results My argument is that respect for sport should mean more than observing sporting rules and include respect for the tradition and practice of each sport: hence the necessity of the unwritten law regarding overwhelming victory. I also suggested that the mercy rule be applied in a heavily lopsided game in order to maintain sportsmanship in a rational way. Conclusion My discussion on the unwritten law about overwhelming victory from the viewpoint of sportsmanship may reveal the significance of the essence of sports, attitude towards competition as mutual request for excellence, and the importance of winning.
Purpose This study aims to contemplate the identity and significance of sport ethics as an independent academic field by examining how it began and developed, where it is now, and where it will or should be moving forward. Methods First, a history of sports philosophy which gave birth to sport ethics is surveyed. Second, the emergence of sport ethics in the historical development of sport philosophy is analyzed. Third, major methodologies and theoretical frames of sport ethics are introduced. Last, what needs to be done in South Korea in relation to sport ethics is suggested. Results Sport ethics in the future is expected to resort to interdisciplinary approaches which combine a variety of academic disciplines and methodologies. In addition, sport ethics must relate its theory to practice. The pressing task for sport ethics in South Korea is to establish its identity as a separate academic field. In order to do this, we should figure out what to study in sport ethics, and continue to study about the range, methodology, and theoretical frame of sport ethics. Conclusions The establishment and development of an academic field becomes only possible when fully supported by numerous scholars’ work, practical achievement of the field, and a diversity of policy and institution, and a continued discussion and agreement on the content and methods of the discipline. In order to enhance its status as well as professionalism of sport ethics scholars, researchers of various academic backgrounds should study sport ethics, exchange ideas on theory and methodology, and spread results of studies through education, guiding through the development of sports.
