Peer Review Policy

  • HOME
  • EDITORIAL POLICY
  • Peer Review Policy

All papers, including those invited by the Editor, are subject to peer review. Manuscripts are reviewed by at least 3 external experts and editors. Korean Journal of Sport Science’s average turnaround time from submission to decision is 6 weeks. The editor is responsible for the final decision whether the manuscript is accepted or rejected.

Double blind peer review

Korean Journal of Sport Science adopts double blind review, which means that the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and vice versa.

Reviewer instruction

Instructions for Reviewers

This is a guideline for reviewers who voluntarily participate in peer review process of the journal. All of the journal's contents including commissioned manuscripts are subject to peer-review.

Double blind peer review

Korean Journal of Sport Science adopts double blind review, which means that the reviewers and authors cannot identify each others’ information.

Role of reviewers

Peer reviewer’s role is to advise editors on individual manuscript to revise, accept, or reject. Judgments should be objective and comments should be lucidly described. Scientific soundness is the most important value of the journal; therefore, logic and statistical analysis should be considered meticulously. The use of reporting guideline is recommended for review. Reviewers should have no conflict of interest. Reviewers should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited. Reviewed articles are managed confidentially. The editorial office is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject a manuscript based on the reviewers' recommendation.

How to write review comments

After entering the e-submission system with ID and password, please download PDF files and supplementary files. It is not necessary to comment on the style and format, but just concentrate on the scientific soundness and logical interpretation of the results.


• Comment to authors: Summarize the whole content of manuscript in one sentence. Please make a specific comment according to the order of each section of the manuscript. Page mark is good to trace the review comment. The reviewer’s recommendation on acceptance should not be stated at the comment to authors. Consider if the peer review opinion may increase the quality of manuscript or further research by author.

• Comment to editor: Both the strength and shortness of the manuscript are recommended to be added. The reviewer’s recommendation on acceptance may be added here including special opinion to editor.

Ethical guideline for reviewers

  • 1. Any information acquired during the review process is confidential.
  • 2. Please inform the editor on any conflicts of interest as follows:
    Reviewer is a competitor.
    Reviewer may have an antipathy with the author(s).
    Reviewer may profit financially from the work.
  • In case of any of the above conflicts of interest, the reviewer should decline to review. If the reviewer still wishes to review, the conflicts of interest should be specifically disclosed. A history of previous collaboration with the authors or any intimate relationship with the authors does not prohibit the review.
  • 3. Reviewer should not use any material or data originated from the manuscript in review; however, it is possible to use open data of the manuscript after publication.

Post-review work by the editorial office

Review opinions and decisions may be analyzed by the editorial office without identifying the reviewer.


Korean Journal of
Sport Science

Print ISSN: 1598-2920
Online ISSN: 2233-2920

  • 787 Analysis of Entrepreneurial Process Based on Domestic Introduction of Sport Contents: Focusing on the Innovation Diffusion Process Model
    608 Analysis of Muscle Activity During Shooting Motion of Korean Traditional Archers
    394 Analysis of muscle mobilization patterns and stop position of stones during sweeping each section of curling hog to hog
    321 The participation process of PEAK program for collegiate Taekwondo athletes: A grounded theory approach
    319 The Effect of Cognitive and Affective trust on Sport Fan Behavior after Team’s Loss: A case of the US men’s national soccer team viewership

    +more

    +more

    • GoogleScholar
    • Similarity Check
    • Crossref Cited-by Linking
    • CrossMark
    • Funder Registry
    • ORCID


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Korea Institute of Sport Science, 727 Hwarang-lo, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01794, Korea
Tel: +82-2-970-9570    Fax: +82-2-970-9651    E-mail: publ@kspo.or.kr                

Copyright © 2021 by Korea Institute of Sport Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next